USER     PASSWORD  
 Forgot username or password? Click here.
Last Mass Effect 2 DLC This Month
Filed under: MASS EFFECT 2, DLC, BIOWARE
BioWare confirms that the last round of downloadable content for Mass Effect 2 is set to arrive on March 29, for the PC, 360 and PS3. Here's the word:

At the furthest edge of the galaxy, the Reapers are preparing to make their return. Will Commander Shepard have what it takes to stand in their way?

“All year, we have been extremely honored and humbled by the reception we have received for Mass Effect 2 from players around the world, including our post release DLC”, said Casey Hudson, Executive Producer, Mass Effect series. “Mass Effect: Arrival is an exciting extension to Mass Effect 2 and will show players just how close the Reapers are to returning and completing their deadly harvest.”




26 post(s)
Reader Comments
tRM [mail] Mar 19 2011, 10:40 am EDT
If they announce some add-on -ish package that includes all the stupid DLC I might just be persuaded to asses my willingness to actually give a damn.
Terminator [mail] Mar 19 2011, 11:15 am EDT
This DLC bullshit is really pissing me off. We pay full price for games, then find out there is another $20 worth of DLC to buy. I'm not made of money dammit.

*sigh* I need a new hobby....
  Fatty: Should have waited for the sale they had - $2.50 for each DL...
SeriousAlex [mail] Mar 19 2011, 11:57 am EDT
I think its great that they make something as good as ME2, then release some quality DLC (Shadow broker was excellent). The end of ME2 left me wanting more and I think the DLC has helped bridge the gap to ME3. And lets be honest, $20 isn't too bad.
un om bun [mail] Mar 19 2011, 01:35 pm EDT
Go fuck yourselves and your shitty DLCs.

I hope we're still friends.
Doomsday. [mail] Mar 19 2011, 01:55 pm EDT
Buy the game Fuck the DLCs!!

edit: Excited bout this though! Wohoo!
Duffey [mail] Mar 19 2011, 04:50 pm EDT
Random question so they didn;t really end the story after u brought the full game u now have to get this dlc in order to bridge the gap between the second and third installement? isn;t this what dlc fanboys say doesn;t happy i.e needing to spend $20 to finsh the game :/
KraGeRzR [mail] Mar 19 2011, 04:51 pm EDT
Piracy - the best method of whipping corrupt execs into shape.

Just buy the game, and merrily pirate the DLC as a direct fuck you... It's what Jesus would do...
  Terminator: That is tempting. Very tempting.
Tastysanchez [mail] Mar 19 2011, 05:05 pm EDT
Why are people so angry? They're developing new content and offering it for sale?

They couldn't put it on the original game because A the DVD was full and B they hadn't fucking made it yet!

So they decide to make more content for their popular game and are offering to sell it as a product that you can buy. It's called trade and was invented hundreds of thousands of years ago. So if cavemen can understand the concept I'm sure you will be able to.

Or if it's still too hard for you to understand maybe you should start working for free and see how well that goes for you.
  im_stardust: What a load of crap.
Terminator: They should be making expansion packs, not fucking DLC. I we...
Cheddar: Dragon Age's DLC is mediocre because I suspect Dragon Age is...
im_stardust: "Mass Effect 2 had DLC released with the main-game that was ...
Cheddar: All caps to make the crucial point of emphasis jump out at p...
Sleek: owned stardust.
S.Plissken [mail] Mar 19 2011, 05:52 pm EDT
weren't DLC's called expansion packs back in the day? Don't remember that ever getting this kind of response.
  AtomicViking: Yeah, they just turned DLC into more accessible bite sized c...
Terminator: Easier and more profitable. DLC is a pathetic waste. Nothing...
Cheddar: Termi, expansion packs back in the day cost 20-30 bucks, so ...
im_stardust: "it gives us more options and less waiting," More embarra...
S.Plissken: Seems we think old fashioned Cheddar, oh well its my money a...
Cheddar: What kills me is how all these guys here bitch about this DL...
EricHalfBee: I loved Limbo because it was INDIE. That's the arbitrary lab...
LostPcGamer [mail] Mar 19 2011, 06:48 pm EDT
Gotta love dlc it made expansions packs obsolete and let publishers charge more for less. Its a win for them and a FU to you.

Now let me put on my pirate hat while I get the dlc for nothing and return the thought. While I shed a tear for the departed expansion packs.
  optimus slime: Thats a healthy way of thinking.
Cheddar: Says the blind leading the blind.
optimus slime: A man who repeatedly tries to justify corporate greed by cal...
LostPcGamer: Here we go the you couldn't of finished it Without skipping...
ZeroWolf [mail] Mar 20 2011, 01:51 am EDT
For the love of Grabthar, DLC =/= Expansion Packs

Expansion Packs = For 10 bucks you get 10 or more hours worth of content.
DLC = For 10 bucks you get 1 hours worth of content.

GET IT?!?
  Cheddar: Uh, expansion packs back in the day were never 10 bucks. ...
Killer Klown: That, and you're lucky to get ten hours out of most _main_ g...
un om bun [mail] Mar 20 2011, 03:00 am EDT
It's obvious that most DLC supporting fucks are too comfortable to care. They think developers are their friends and have their best interests in mind. And while there's money in their pockets, they can feed this nice illusion. They're a bunch of weak-minded pushovers. How could they ever complain when they're addicted to games, always in need of yet another DLC fix ?
SeriousAlex [mail] Mar 20 2011, 03:28 am EDT
I love how this has as usual turned into some juvenile jerk-off. I suppose it does seem to reflect the average age of the users of this site. Why must everything be solved by thinking you are on some righteous crusade against the evil game developers where the only way to get this ill-conceived point across is by pirating, nay stealing, games DLC etc.

Its a fucking joke. Grow up and quit moaning, you don't like it, piss off and stop play games. No-one said you have to buy anything.

But yeah, lets still be friends.
  Tastysanchez: Exactly in every other scenario if you don't like a product ...
un om bun: And what do you fine gents suggest we do ? I mean those of u...
tRM: Trying to find a decent game that is not designed as a trilo...
optimus slime: That way of thinking is so unbelievably stupid, that I can't...
Tastysanchez: Well if they did that I wouldn't buy it either but that does...
LostPcGamer: "But yeah, lets still be friends." I dont think so I hate...
KraGeRzR: Meh, pulling the mature card doesn't work here. When you'...
Cheddar: I don't think throwing in the word "fucking" once classifies...
tRM: If the saves-data from a DLC transfers over to the next inst...
EricHalfBee [mail] Mar 20 2011, 04:56 am EDT
Wow DLC and Piracy now rolled into one big FLAME. Mmm toasty I'm warming my feet on this thread and reaching for the marshmallows. Well in for a penny in for a pound: I'm against piracy and against DLCs (only because I perceive them to be poor value) - I like extra content. I suppose I wish more gamers opted to assess the value and turn down the purchase. But hey one man's rip-off is another man's eagerly awaited opportunity.

DLCs work because they target a gamer's passion. I'd just like to see the fans of a title, who've made it successful, rewarded with some great value or even free content rather than getting ever so slightly exploited. I'll put those ever so pink specs down now before I get really gushily sentimental for 1p sweets and fish 'n' chips in proper newspaper.
  un om bun: Someone should write lyrics to the tune of Ebony & Ivory by ...
EricHalfBee: Maybe it's just late but I can't even disagree un om bun.
Cheddar [mail] Mar 20 2011, 02:57 pm EDT
Looking at the prices...

Kasumi, Overlord, Shadow Broker, and Arrival add up to roughly a 30 buck value.

That's... just like an old expansion pack, at just about the same price... except it's broken up into parts, allowing us to both pick and choose what we do and don't want, as well as play parts of it much earlier than if we had to wait for it to all be finished for one total package.

There's only advantage here. For us as consumers, because it gives us more options and less waiting, and for the business itself, because a steady stream of post-release expansion content will keep people iinterested in the game longer than if they had to wait a year after the main-game before a large expansion pack is made available.

Just like some games are rip-offs and some games aren't, some DLC is a ripoff and some DLC isn't. Feel free to criticize the millions of idiots who pay 15 bucks for a small multiplayer map-pack. THAT'S bad-value DLC.

But this particular DLC, clearly developed post-release as expansion material and appropriately priced? Not so much.
  AtomicViking: my thoughts exactly
S.Plissken: Oh well it might just be that im part of the lower section o...
Sleek [mail] Mar 20 2011, 05:09 pm EDT
People bitch when companies don't release new content for games.

People bitch when companies do release new content for games.

Awesome.
im_stardust [mail] Mar 20 2011, 05:24 pm EDT
I can't believe this clueless ass hole is trying to compare DLC with expansion packs, in ANY WAY.

30 bucks to play around 3 hours divided in small pieces, one every few months VS dozens of hours of gameplay from expansions like Lord of Destruction, Bloodmoon, Tribunal, Forgotten Battles...even expansions from The Sims.

Am I that addicted and impatient, I can't wait for an expansion like Dragon Age 2? and I have to eat crumbs of rushed material?

Implying that the consumers also benefit from DLC more than an expansion is completely, utterly idiotic.

Are you working for Bioware or EA? or are you that stupid?
  Cheddar: I methodically backed up my point with numbers and objective...
Alchi: Maybe you should do your homework, stardie and till then Shu...
im_stardust: So, there are current and outdated industry standards reg...
AtomicViking: The Lost and the Damned is DLC, so is the Ballad Of Gay Tony...
im_stardust: They are expansion packs.
im_stardust [mail] Mar 20 2011, 05:33 pm EDT
The true purpose of adding an expansion or a dlc to a game is either because consumers are unsatisfied by the final product or because the product has had a lot of success and consumers want more.

Adding a quest, a companion and a gun, some even at the game launch, doesn't sound to me as pleasing the costumers. Sounds more like MONEY MAKING, MONEY MAKING, MONEY MAKING!!!!!



Cheddar [mail] Mar 20 2011, 06:29 pm EDT
All combined, the Mass Effect 2 mission-content DLC will clock in at around 8-10 hours of extra gameplay, if Arrival's length is as expected.

At roughly half the price of the main-game,

that

is

fair

value.

By today's standards, that is, in which 8-10 hours of gameplay is all too often deemed long enough for 60 dollar games, for chrissake.

ME2's mission-based DLC is a bad value if we're comparing it to late-90s / early 00s standards (when you had "expansion packs" like Half-Life's Opposing Force that would be full-priced games today). But here in 2011, it's quite fair. And certainly better value than 95% of DLC out there, for the quality as much as the price.


(btw, for the record, I DO think the various weapon-pack DLC for ME2 is bad-value, nickel-and-dime bullshit, but then that's trivial crap and easily dismissed... it's for the sort of people who can't resist picking up some candy while waiting in the checkout line, just because it's there)
LostPcGamer [mail] Mar 20 2011, 07:45 pm EDT
Sorry Cheddar all I hear is dlc supporter bullshit. I personally want the 15+ hr expansion pack instead of 30 min dlc packs for $10. Oh wait wanting more than just dlc is so old school like 10 years ago in your opinion.
  Cheddar: If each mission DLC actually was 30 minutes long, then it re...
im_stardust: If you take the dialogues out it might be even less then 30 ...
Tastysanchez: So... you don't count dialogue as part game time in ME2? Wel...
Cheddar [mail] Mar 20 2011, 08:17 pm EDT
That's all you hear, because that's all you've decided you're willing to hear.

I realize sweeping generalizations (e.g. "it's DLC, and all DLC is bad, so kill it with fire!") are more comforting and convenient.
Tastysanchez [mail] Mar 21 2011, 12:29 am EDT
Does anyone know the first game to use DLC? Was it oblivion with the shitty horse armour?
  Vodoo: yes, oblivion started the trend.
Juxtapose: DLC has been around for a long time, it was just never calle...
un om bun [mail] Mar 21 2011, 02:16 am EDT
This is pretty much like ye episodic games debate of olde. Even if I could arrive to the conclusion that some DLC is fairly priced, I'd still much rather play 1 meaty expansion pack that continues the story, than bits and pieces of side quests scattered over the period of 6 months. Who wouldn't ? Assuming we have 1 good 6hr long xp vs. 6 good DLCs, also at a total of 6hrs... DLC still loses.

No way and no how is returning to a game for 1hr after a month you finished it, as satisfying as playing an expansion pack. And the current state of DLC isn't even the problem. It's what's yet to come. You can bet your life that even if a handful of companies will try to be fair, and I'm using that term loosely here, most will still look for the best possible milking scenario. "Let's walk the line between minimum work and maximum profit".
  Alchi: The answer is simple. Wait for all the DLC's to be release...
im_stardust: You are repeating what I just said Un om bun.
Sleek [mail] Mar 21 2011, 03:51 am EDT
Stardust is actually retarded. Of course they're trying to make money, what else would they be doing?

Do you work at a restaurant just to serve people food, or do you do it to make money? Those money grabbing bastard food merchants! All they want is my money!

Yes, that is all they fucking want. They make games not to please you, but to make money. Yes, to make money they must please first, build reputation etc etc, but the money is the reason the developers work several years to make such games.

Why give people value, when they still make a hefty profit off rip off map packs, extra guns etc, because people are eager (and stupid) enough to waste money on them? It's not a charity, it's a business.
  im_stardust: Of course that's what most people want, you fucking cretin. ...
im_stardust: There's a lot of room on this market now and little competit...
optimus slime [mail] Mar 21 2011, 07:07 am EDT
Some need to hear it a couple of times, stardust, from different people, because they clearly aren't getting it.

It isn't about price or length. It's about game experience.
Strip ME or DA or Bethesda games of all DLCs and then take out all of the expansion packs from, lets say, Blizzard or Relic games. Now compare how much will you miss out if you just play the original games. I think you'll find that the difference is quite vast.

They are called expansion packs, because they expand the experience of a game. They extend it with meaningful additions. Its a continuity of the content and story. A relevant story that usually packs as much punch as the original.
And most importantly, it is rounded and whole.

Of course, this warrants for a generic "don't like, don't buy" reply and I will not debate that anymore, because it is applicable for everything in life. This is about comparing value in experience, which I think DLCs in their current form don't have, equally priced or not.
LostPcGamer [mail] Mar 21 2011, 12:46 pm EDT
Whatever its a bane that needs to be put to the torch and thanks for the gaming generation for making it this way. I can see it now a subpar half finished game where you must buy the dlc to finish. Its coming and all of you will probably embrace it.
COMMENTS PAGE 1




POST A COMMENT
Username:Password:



SEND THIS PAGE TO A FRIEND
Easily fill in your friends' emails to send them this page.
 
 
BACK TO TOP
TOP VIDEOS
VOTING POLL

Single-player RPG or MMORPG?

MMORPG.
Single-player RPG.
» view results
» view poll archives
TOP SCREENSHOTS
See previous images
See next images
 
 
TOP COMICS
Top Video Game AdvertizingPrototype 2 - No Suspicious ActivityThe Life of Max Payne 2
 
TOP BABES
Three days ago