LATEST NEWS
- Resigned EA CEO Says "Gamers Will Learn to Love" Always-Online
- Final Fantasy XIV Marches to August 27th Re-Release
- Nintendo Schedules Next Direct Presentation on First Day of E3
- New Saints Row Hail to the Chief Video Series
- Grand Theft Auto 5 CE & SE Detailed
- EA Supporting Current-Gen Consoles Until 2017
- Mornin '13
- Xbox Live Marketplace Update: May 21st, 2013
- Metro: Last Light Gets 4 DLC Packs Planned, Season Pass Available
- Ryse Confirmed as Xbox One Exclusive
- Battlefield 4 Will Be Available this Holiday for Next-Gen
- Call of Duty: Ghosts Xbox One Media
- Forza Motorsport 5 Xbox One Screens & Trailer
- Xbox One Specs
- Mornin '13
LATEST CHEATS
LATEST VIDEOS
- Forza Motorsport 5
Trailer - Call of Duty: Ghosts
BTS Trailer - The Last of Us
Death & Choices Dev Diary - Batman: Arkham Origins
Trailer - Resident Evil: Revelations
Launch Trailer - The Elder Scrolls Online
Gathering And Exploration Dev. Diary - Gran Turismo 6
Debut Trailer
LATEST FILES
- Far Cry 3
Patch 1.05 - Assassin's Creed 3
Patch v1.02 to v1.03 - Far Cry 3
Patch 1.04 - Far Cry 3
Patch 1.02 - Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Patch 1.4 to 1.5 - Max Payne 3
Patch v1.0.0.56 - Max Payne 3
Patch v1.0.0.55
CONTACT US
Mornin '09
Uros "Vader" Pavlovic
05:10 am EDT @ July 07th, 2009
Now, scientists are actually saying that in order to enjoy sex you do not need
to experience an orgasm. Not only that, but they also say that two partners
don't even need to be attracted to each other or have any chemistry between
them whatsoever in order to get the most pleasure out of sexual intercourse.
Well, that's what I read in this morning's newspaper anyway.
Okay, I've always believed in science, but excuse me for saying this:
WHAT
THE
FUCK?
26 post(s)
Reader Comments| COMMENTS PAGE 1 |
POST A COMMENT
BACK TO TOP
TOP VIDEOS
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
VOTING POLL
Are you excited about Call of Duty: Ghosts?
TOP SCREENSHOTS
 |
 |
|
TOP COMICS
true story.
Religion says that "it is better that your seed fall into the belly of a whore than wasted on the ground".
Go find reason in the fucking bible then.
masturbation - sex
Sex is always better with another person, why ? because your mind considers that union with the respective fuck uplifts your worth as a human being.
Sex is better because it proves to people with low self esteem they shouldn’t go blow their brains out.
So in this case sex is bad because the gene pool is in need of cleaning and thanks to social acceptance, the janitor quit.
Vader, you should be seriously ashamed to trust the scientists when it comes to sex.
What the hell do those nerds (pardon the expression) know about love?
They don’t even have any ‘good’ equipment to have any meaningful sex.
Anywho, just read the history of science and see for yourself, how they are ALWAYS changing their stand on everything.
Well, almost everything. They are good for a few things…
But sex? F*ck them! (You know, to teach them about the subject).
Sure, this makes sense, look at all of the pissed off people we have in the world today, not to mention the tards and ass-bites that have jobs and access to sharp pointy objects.
DOWN WITH LOVE AND ATTRACTION....BANG MISS. BAKER WITH THE LAZY EYE AND THE HOLE IN HER THROAT!!!! PROCREATE WITH AN OX!!!!
....Science.
Happy Birthday to me,
Happy Birthday JamesPC,
Happy Birthday to me.
I'm 27 years old today, time just flies by after 18.
Anyway, I think that article about sex is a bunch of bullshit. You MUST have some chemistry between you and your partner to fully enjoy sex. Then again, I don't do one night stands, so perhaps you can enjoy yourself without any chemistry.
Welcome to the World day JamesPC!
Is this the best pick up line they can come up with?
Come on science geeks, you can do better than that!
What scientists? I wanna detailed descriptions of those supposed scientists and also who they fucked. Then we will see what is what. Lots of money is spent on useless research. If all the money spent on boob research would have been diverted instead to space program, we would now be eating McNuggets in moon base...
Are you telling me that I can enjoy swimming standing on the shore?
Or that I can enjoy the game without playing it?
Or maybe, they were doing this research with old hags with a bag on their heads. That would explain why they had no chemistry between the subject...
The next thing you know they gonna start selling orgasm in form of pills (not the viagra, you gotta do the job yourself)
Mornin'
if i don't need to enjoy orgazem, why the fuck do i jerk off?
I'm not really surprised at the conclusions found by these "scientists" in today's post. These days, pretty much everyone prescribes to the notion that we are just highly evolved monkeys. If that's really the case, it should be no surprise that sex can be enjoyable with anyone really. You don't see animals getting married and divorced do you?
Screw the standards, all skanks are fair game including their mother's with peg legs and aunts with wonky eyes. That crazy babbling chick that stands on the corner with odd shaped boobs, bangable now, the slow girl on the fry cooker, bangable now with a side of curlies.
It means that science sanctions the following:
screw monogamy, screw marriage, screw commitment, screw love
Just screw everything you find, but dont take Gerbel's advice, please do only chase decent tail, we arent priests so its not our mission to bring salvation to the damned.
I dont fully agree with the "no orgasm needed" part but oh well... we can simply ignore that.
Now on a less stupid side, what they mean is likely that the amount of endorphines released during a complete strangers sex is likely the same as the amount released during the "i love you sex", although i dont really understand why the no orgasm part, it makes no sense but then again they are the scientists.
In analitical terms it might be correct, but in real life terms, fuck them, it feel so much better when there's love and all bettew them, also orgasm.