LATEST NEWS
- No Backwards Compatibility with Xbox One
- Xbox One Does NOT Have to Always Be Online
- Call of Duty: Ghosts Shown On Xbox One, Timed-Exclusive DLC
- Halo TV Series Announced
- Watch Live TV with Xbox One [Updated]
- Microsoft Announces Its Next Console: Xbox One
- REVIEW: Metro: Last Light
- Peter Molyneux's Godus Going Mobile
- Mornin '13
- Google Sees 700% Increase From In-App Purchases
- Star Wars: Rebels TV Series Announced
- Nintendo Promises to Talk about New Mario Games before E3
- A Positively Kick-ass Batman: Arkham Origins Cinematic
- Sony Teases Video of PS4 E3 Reveal
- UK Gamers Want Metro Last Light
- Mornin '13
LATEST CHEATS
LATEST VIDEOS
- The Last of Us
Death & Choices Dev Diary - Batman: Arkham Origins
Trailer - Resident Evil: Revelations
Launch Trailer - The Elder Scrolls Online
Gathering And Exploration Dev. Diary - Gran Turismo 6
Debut Trailer - Batman: Arkham Origins
Batman: Arkham Origins features an expanded Gotham City and introduces an original prequel storyline occurring several years before the events of Batman: Arkham Asylum and Batman: Arkham City. Taking place before the rise of Gotham City\'s most dangerous - Metro: Last Light
Launch Trailer
LATEST FILES
- Far Cry 3
Patch 1.05 - Assassin's Creed 3
Patch v1.02 to v1.03 - Far Cry 3
Patch 1.04 - Far Cry 3
Patch 1.02 - Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Patch 1.4 to 1.5 - Max Payne 3
Patch v1.0.0.56 - Max Payne 3
Patch v1.0.0.55
CONTACT US
Mornin '12
Uros "Vader" Pavlovic
04:38 am EDT @ November 09th, 2012
So, a few days ago, I went to watch Skyfall and I must say, the movie proved to me more interesting than I expected. Quantum of Solace was a big load of horse shit. Although Daniel Craig would be the last man on Earth I'd pick to play Bond, this movie somehow feels very Bondish (unlike the previous two). The characters have grown and are more believable this time. Also, I love how they've dispensed with all the Bond clich's. Setting up a new 'M' character is a slick move and how it's done in the movie will be appreciated by most people, I think.
All in all, a good Bond flick.
Just that I never understood why anyone would put an ugly bastard like Daniel Craig to portray a character like Bond. He's a fine actor and all, but that's not enough for Bond. Whoever made the decision was blind as a bat. Put Craig next to Sean Connery and you'll know what I mean. Judging by appearances, it just doesn't make sense. At this point, it would've made more sense if they chose Stephen Hawking.
22 post(s)
Reader Comments| COMMENTS PAGE 1 |
POST A COMMENT
BACK TO TOP
TOP VIDEOS
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
VOTING POLL
Are you excited about Call of Duty: Ghosts?
TOP SCREENSHOTS
 |
 |
|
TOP COMICS
My understanding is a good many women find Mr Craig attractive. I know what you mean about the Connery comparison, but as you have pointed out, so many of the Bond cliches have been thrown out, so what's wrong with the lead looking more rugged. After all, 007's history is a naval one, stands to reason he would look a little rougher round the edges.
Also, the second Craig bond movie should be referred to as 'Question of Sport'
That BotD's skin looks very suspect.
But that's not what I'm talking about.
Bond needs to have charm and sex appeal. He's not supposed to look like a goon.
Sean had charm, even Pierce and fucking Roger Moore.
This guy? No. He's just a good actor whose head looks like a potato with clumsily carved human features on it.
Right for the charm but he isn't a idiot like Pierce and not a clown lie Moore. I prefer a great actor then a good looking morons. Sean Connery play the playboy MI6 Bond but i really prefer the MI6 real agent of Craig. Sean Connery is James Bond for sure, but Craig are my second one... And for the charm hmmmm.... you can't judge that, like said Reikhardt, lot of girls say he are attractive and charming. You just remind the shower scene in Casino Royal ;) .
They removed both in the last 3 movies.
Honestly, i think these are completely different movies but with the same title.
Okay, i haven't seen the last one yet but i'm guessing they didn't re add the gadgets and humor.
All in all, it's a good bond and a good movie on its own.
DB5 is the only car in history that's better looking than the 1967 mustang Fastback (Elinor from Gone in 60 seconds)
I also like Craig's Bond, he might not be fantastic looking, but he's one of the few Bonds you can actually imagine doing dirty work, killing folks and chasing people around. As far as I'm concerned, Craig and Connery are the only two who've had the necessary vicious streak for the role.
Craig ain't much of a bond. He ain't slick looking. He'll be thrown out when Nolan gets his shot at directing a bond film.
Anyway I'm going to watch Looper and Sinister on Sunday so hopefully I can wash of this bad taste that Skyfall left on me.
Like some people already pointed out Craig is the best Bond ever. Not like all the previous ones just posing around the whole movies, looking pretty and throwing bad jokes. I haven't watched the last one yet, but Casino Royal is the best Bond movie ever to me. But, I'm not really a Bond kind of a guy. My play is Jason Bourne. Now, those movies (those with Mat Damon I mean) are awesome. Since new Bourne, everyone is trying to mimic that type of action. Including Bond.
The time for fantasy is clearly over.
I agree.
Oh and you're gay too. We all are. Why do you think we cockslap our way to greatness every day of the week?
This guy, Daniel Craig, represents the modern average joe, your garbage man, your plummer, the postman, that dude who fucks your wife or the cop that gives you a ticket, the asshole.
Charm? Sex appeal? Sophistication ? The women that appreciated those qualities are either 80 years old or fucking dead.
Look at what most women AND men prefer this days...
SUPERFICIALITY
Boring. As. Fuck.
And it's why the franchise was in the shitter after Brosnan stumbled away from it.
Quantum of Solace sucked (I literally fell asleep in the theater), but at least in Casino Royale, Craig was the first Bond ever to be more than just a lame cliche. The guy actually seemed like a real human being, for once. And it's why the franchise took back off again after the horror that was Die Another Day.
I haven't seen Skyfall yet, so I don't know if it's more of Solace's disappointment or a return to Royale's form.
But I haven't seen this one yet we'll see.