- SimCity's Amusement Park Pack Leaked, Releases May 28th
- Metal Gear Rising Revengeance Re-Confirmed For PC Release
- Game Gear Games Coming to 3DS eShop
- Nintendo Open E3 Gaming Doors to Public at Best Buy
- The Wonderful 101 Gets a Release Date
- GTA 5 Screens - Cars, Motorbikes and Scuba Diving
- Black Ops 2 Uprising DLC Ships
- Driveclub PS4 Screenshots
- The Elder Scrolls Online Gathering & Exploration Video
- Mornin '13
- EA's Upcoming MOBA Titled Dawngate Debuts Before Announcement
- Study Shows Decline in Game Piracy
- Nintendo Direct Presentation for Summer ReleasesTomorrow
- EA Discontinues Online Passes
- Batman: Arkham Origins Teaser Trailer
- Metro: Last Light PC Fixes
- Gran Turismo 6 Teaser Trailer
- Mornin '13
- The Elder Scrolls Online
Gathering And Exploration Dev. Diary - Gran Turismo 6
Debut Trailer - Batman: Arkham Origins
Batman: Arkham Origins features an expanded Gotham City and introduces an original prequel storyline occurring several years before the events of Batman: Arkham Asylum and Batman: Arkham City. Taking place before the rise of Gotham City\'s most dangerous - Metro: Last Light
Launch Trailer - Resident Evil: Revelations
Panic Dev. Diary - Command & Conquer
Beyond the Battle Dev Diary - Assassin's Creed 4: Black Flag
True Golden Age of Pirates trailer
- Far Cry 3
Patch 1.05 - Assassin's Creed 3
Patch v1.02 to v1.03 - Far Cry 3
Patch 1.04 - Far Cry 3
Patch 1.02 - Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Patch 1.4 to 1.5 - Max Payne 3
Patch v1.0.0.56 - Max Payne 3
Patch v1.0.0.55

Grabbed the opportunity to watch The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey last night. To put it simply, I'm struggling to understand why so many critics aren't giving it much praise. True enough, there was plenty of room here to give the audience something new and different. It feels a bit like you're back watch Lord of the Rings. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that was the whole point wasn't it? It's Peter Jackson and it's the same setting and there many familiar faces from the old LotR cast have returned, including Cate Blanchett, Hugo Weaving, Elijah Wood, Sir Ian McKellen, Ian Holm and so on. So, some critics have even called this film tedious. It's anything but. Trust me. It's a lovely little fairy tale and an exciting journey, especially for viewers who appreciate Peter Jackson's earlier flicks. J.R.R. Tolkien fans should be pleased as well. Emphasis on the word "should" though.
My only gripe in this instance is that they've done little to elaborate on Tolkien's incredibly rich lore. I would've like to have seen more of the elvish kingdoms and a deeper story about some of the fleeting characters. It's obvious that they're saving this for the next two installments. On the other hand, I do understand that the dwarves are supposed to be the center of this tale and in that respect Pete and Fran give us a lot to hold on to. Thorin Oakenshield is a bad-ass to say the least and the movie delves deep into the history of the character, as well as the dwarven race.
No matter what you expect to see yourself, nothing will change the fact that these are still good storytellers and great movie makers. Don't miss out on watching this one on the big screen and in 3D.
| COMMENTS PAGE 1 |
BACK TO TOP












Anyway, I consider all three Lord of The Rings to be one the best movies, ever made.
Will watch this soon!
Btw the trailer for Pacific Rim and Man of Steel look awesome!
From everything I've read so far, The Hobbit was made for the hardcore fans and I hope Jackson won't shorten parts 2 & 3 because of the short attention span crowd. I saw Cloud Atlas and I hated it for being crap, not because of it's length. The Hobbit's a few minutes shorter so I can't imagine it's length will make me anything but happy.
They've taken a book with at most two climax scenes (and even two is debatable) and somehow stretched it into three movies... and the first one is already longer than it would take me to read fully a third of the actual novel! The book isn't even particularly long for a fantasy epic (about 300 pages, which is pretty short... to give the non-readers here a frame of perspective, Fellowship of the Ring alone was 500+ pages long).
I don't mind long movies, myself. I expect I'll like The Hobbit just fine. Hell, it'll probably even be a bit of an improvement over the novel itself, which frankly is overrated (by grace of its association with the far superior trilogy written 15 years later) and isn't representative of Tolkein's best form as a writer.
But I can still keep off the fanboy goggles and see the reality here for what it is: The Hobbit is being made into three movies because it's effectively three times the profits.
You're damn right its for the fans.
Specifically, it's for the fan's wallets.
Exactly what I was going to say Cheddar. It is way too long a film and a book which can never justify 3 films. In Mark Kermode's review he said that Peter Jackson could really have don with an evil editor sat on his shoulder and forced him to cut the film drastically in length.
I'm still pissed off that they CHANGED THE COUNTRY'S LAWS in order to get this thing made here.
I'm sure it's a nice movie though.
The LOTR and Hobbit movies simply cannot do justice to the books, and the books, including the Hobbit, are masterpieces of fiction far and above most of the tripe that's been written in the last century.
The first reason for this is that Tolkien was a descriptive genius, and any filmed work won't look anything like the images that you or I imagined while reading it.
The second reason is that the movies were made in a completely different era by people who don't share the same convictions, for an audience who don't share the same convictions, and so it can't possibly be a faithful adaptation in that regard.
But you don't believe me, nor should you. Enjoy.
Peter Jackson read the novels and turned words into pictures, more exactly his understanding of those words into whatever picture he deemed worthy of presenting to the world.
a movie is a movie, a book is a book.
you compare books with other books and movies with other movies; regardless of which came first.
learn to differentiate the medium you are criticizing.