LATEST NEWS
- Mornin '13
- Resigned EA CEO Says "Gamers Will Learn to Love" Always-Online
- Final Fantasy XIV Marches to August 27th Re-Release
- Nintendo Schedules Next Direct Presentation on First Day of E3
- New Saints Row Hail to the Chief Video Series
- Grand Theft Auto 5 CE & SE Detailed
- EA Supporting Current-Gen Consoles Until 2017
- Mornin '13
LATEST CHEATS
LATEST VIDEOS
- Forza Motorsport 5
Trailer - Call of Duty: Ghosts
BTS Trailer - The Last of Us
Death & Choices Dev Diary - Batman: Arkham Origins
Trailer - Resident Evil: Revelations
Launch Trailer - The Elder Scrolls Online
Gathering And Exploration Dev. Diary - Gran Turismo 6
Debut Trailer
LATEST FILES
- Far Cry 3
Patch 1.05 - Assassin's Creed 3
Patch v1.02 to v1.03 - Far Cry 3
Patch 1.04 - Far Cry 3
Patch 1.02 - Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Patch 1.4 to 1.5 - Max Payne 3
Patch v1.0.0.56 - Max Payne 3
Patch v1.0.0.55
CONTACT US
Mornin '13
Uros "Vader" Pavlovic
02:28 am EDT @ January 03rd, 2013
There are a lot of things we can learn from 2012. For example, the fact that
we don't need that many sequels. In fact, there should be a law that forbids
the release of any sequel or reboot for a year or two. It would be cool to see
what developers would come up with. Seriously, I don't see any other way to
end this sequel madness. Do you?
10 post(s)
Reader Comments| COMMENTS PAGE 1 |
POST A COMMENT
BACK TO TOP
VOTING POLL












Nothing wrong with sequels, providing they expand and improve upon the original.
Case and point BF3....should have waited.
Xcom should have waited.
Arma3....we'll see.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2013/jan/03/xbox-720-countdown-begins