- Don't Starve Gets Shipwrecked Expansion
- Nvidia Recalling Shield Tablets for Fire Hazard
- Total War: Warhammer In-Game Engine Developer Commentary
- New Battlefield Game in 2016
- EA's Financial Results Exceed Expectations
- FEATURE: Open Worlds Devouring Small Ones
- Rocket League Sales Top 5 Million, Free Content Coming
- Mornin '15
- Banjo-Kazooie Spiritual Successor Finds Publisher
- Zombi Leaving the Wii U for Consoles
- Comcept's Red Ash Funded by Outside Donation
- Ubisoft Swears They Had Evie in Mind Before the Gender Controversy
- PlayStation Plus May Let Subscribers Vote for Free Games
- Final Fantasy Explorers Travels to the West in 2016
- Sony Sold 3 Million PS4s in Q1 2015
- Blizzard Bans StarCraft 2 Cheaters
- Pixels: Turns Out to be A Shame, As Predicted
When a triple-A release comes along, it feels like a big deal. They've invested a lot into its creation and we're supposedly meant to invest a lot of time into it ourselves when it finally arrives. Thief is such a game. I've spent days playing it and trying to figure out why I was excited about its arrival, but also why I was ultimately disappointed. It's no secret any more, the game doesn't deliver half the thrill one would expect of it. Of course, in the end, I remembered that I wasn't all that excited. In fact, I criticized it after seeing various gameplay trailers prior its launch. The hunch I had was that we're going to get something standard and far from innovative. But I wasn't strictly hoping for something groundbreaking. I was just hoping for something a bit more gripping and immersive than this.
If I had to describe Thief in one sentece it would have to be like this:
"Living in the shadows, surrounded by dull people and strolling through an empty, generic world, stealing pens, plates and goblets, but mostly pens."
You can quote me on that, if you wish. That's probably how I should've ended the review.
|COMMENTS PAGE 1|
BACK TO TOP